Planning for the Jobs-Plus Demonstration
Origins and Early Accomplishments of the Jobs-Plus Demonstration
Statistical Implications for the Evaluation of Education Programs
Early Findings from the Self-Sufficiency Project’s Applicant Study
Early Implementation and Ethnographic Findings from the Project on Devolution and Urban Change
Two-Year Results of a Program to Reduce Poverty and Reform Welfare
An evaluation of the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), the state’s welfare waiver program, found that the program produced substantially larger increases in employment and earnings among welfare recipients living in public or subsidized housing than among recipients in private housing. This paper examines several possible reasons that may account for these findings, including differences in characteristics between the two groups of recipients, differences in their proximity to jobs, differences in residential stability, which might aid in the transition to work, and interactions between MFIP’s work incentives and the public/subsidized housing rent rules. The evidence, although indirect, suggests that interactions between MFIP rules and the rent rules in public housing helped to produce larger employment impacts for residents in public or subsidized housing.
A How-To Guide for Planners and Providers of Welfare-to-Work and Other Employment and Training Programs.
Complete 18-Month Findings from the Self-Sufficiency Project